What is Equity? | The Student Lawyer (2022)


Top Tip: If you’re studying Equity on the LLB or GDL and need more detail and example exam answers, then check out our trusted partner Law Answered – and ace your exams with first-class law notes prepared by students and practicing lawyers. If you like what you see, use the code TSL15 to get a 15% discount on any order of their law guides.

(Video) What is Equity

When looking for a general understanding of the word equity, the Oxford dictionary describes it as ‘the quality of being fair and impartial’. This arguably is too vague a definition for legal purposes and gives a personal characteristic explanation, making equity seem as a way to be, not something society wants to achieve.

A legal definition from the Oxford dictionary describes equity as ‘a branch of law that developed alongside common law and is concerned with fairness and justice, formerly administered in special courts’. Arguably this definition is clearer, it explains equity as something legal but again is comparing equity to something else, justice and fairness. This definition is unable to show equity as its own entity. An additional definition which was found from a political dictionary is that ‘equity is a sub-system of English and related legal systems, derived partly from principles of natural justice, and partly from the peculiar historical circumstances which had led to the adoption of those and related principles by the court of chancery in England’. This quote again has links to justice, but is unclear with reference to ‘principles’.

After looking at the different types of definition, the issue that they all possess is that they all have very close ties to justice, making the definition of equity itself very confusing. It should not be forgotten that this is only a legal definition and that equity relates to many other issues, such as health, and not just the law. However, for legal reasoning these definitions have too many or too little meanings. How can definitions based on ‘principles’ be sufficient, when someone reading them may not be aware of what the ‘principles of natural justice’ actually are? This would not allow for a clear understanding, causing inaccuracies. If equity is something that is meant to be universally understood because it can be used by society, the definition needs to make sure that individuals can understand it.

(Video) A Day in the Life of a Private Equity Lawyer

Another example of how hard equity is to define can be seen from the Fordham Law Review of 1951[1]. Oleck and his views on equity’s definition are central to this argument. He starts by saying that ‘the general view is that the term has too many shades of meaning to be described as definitively one’. This quote supports the above argument that there are too many definitions and, if the definitions used so far are generally found to be insufficient, how would one ever find the answer to what is equity and be suitable for all understandings. However, there have been suggestions as to how to move away from the confusion with definition. Oleck expressed another point that ‘it is intended that such a definition be suggestive rather than precise and invite inquiry rather than answer it’. After seeing that current definitions are not sufficient to explain equity, Oleck’s explanation of keeping the definition open is one way of avoiding this. It can be argued to go even further to support the ever changing legal structure and understanding of today’s society. In contrast, all the above evidence can be argued to suggest that equity is not something that is going to be able to be defined due to its close ties to the other principles, meaning the answer to what is equity lies in one of its principles.

Equity is understood by others as a better form of justice due to giving a specific judgement. Equity can be understood generally as justice and fairness. Arguably this can only be achieved if there is certainty within the law, as without the strict rules of law there would not be universal justice and fairness. However, it was and still is evitable that the law will in some cases give ‘unfair’ outcomes and this is where the concept of conscience would be enforced.

When assessing what is equity, all readings and materials around the subject demonstrate that equity has a direct link to conscience, justice, and fairness. It was suggested as far back as 1452 ‘that we are to argue conscience here not the law’. Therefore it is important to see if equity is conscience and what the difference is between the three principles. Conscience has been found to mean ‘a person’s awareness or right or wrong with regard to his or her own thoughts and actions’, making conscience the action which allows judges to deal with the issue, whereby justice and fairness may be seen as the end result and aim of the law and more so equity as a whole.

(Video) Decision 2022: Maryland Gubernatorial Debate | NBC4 Washington

However, the issues with the idea of conscience and equity are found in the definition and application. Various arguments have been fought on how it can be defined when arguably everyone has a different conscience. This issue can be first seen when looking at the historical use of conscience in the equity courts. The early chancellors only had to use their conscience to make decisions, meaning all judges were not subject to any law and could use their conscience. Yet arguably as all the men held the same views and were of the same religion, there was a sense of consistency among the decisions. Although when men with a more legal background were to take over it was argued that ‘one judges perception of right or wrong deferred from another’ and this was where issues started to occur with the distribution of equity.

The historical changes in chancellors, principles, and understanding have somewhat changed the understanding of conscience. Nevertheless there is argument which shows how ‘there would be hardly any consistency of value judgements between various religions’, an argument which goes against the judges using their own views as conscience because of the current complex and modern society we find ourselves in.

It has also been argued that because equity and conscience are there to stop unconscionable results, equity could also have a moral basis. The concept of equity and its moral basis can be supported by Lord Ellesmere’s speech in the Earl of Oxford Case [1615] 1 Ch Rep 1, ‘correct men’s conscience for fraud, breaths of trusts, wrongs and oppressions … And to soften and mollify extremity of the law’. The moral basis here is that equity’s aim is to stop people doing wrong and taking an unfair advantage of situations; this moral basis is now shown through equitable maxims such as ‘equity acts in personam’. Moreover from Lord Ellesmere’s quote it can be argued that equity is more concerned with society’s actions. This means that equity is more concerned with what societies do as being morally incorrect, rather than the thought process, their conscience, which follows. Equity focuses on what is morally right from wrong within the eyes of the law, whereas the law states what is legally right from wrong.

(Video) ECNY Events - David C. Banks

One may feel it can be seen that the answer to what is equity is, in fact, conscience. The eyes of the law are human eyes. The law is made, interpreted and put into action by the legislature, so arguably what society sees or understands as wrong, whatever conscience the judiciary holds or uses through the maxims, would be would equity is. Equity would not suffice without the recognition of someone’s wrongful thoughts or actions, therefore making conscience the defining principle of equity.

[1] Howard L. Oleck, “Historical Nature of Equity Jurisprudence”, 20 Fordham L. Rev. 23 [1951], Pg 1

FAQs

What does in equity mean in law? ›

In law, the term "equity" refers to a particular set of remedies and associated procedures involved with civil law. These equitable doctrines and procedures are distinguished from "legal" ones.

What is equity law example? ›

An example of this is if someone is infringing on a trademark of yours, you can get monetary damages for the loss, but your business could be ruined if they continue. Equity is the additional solution that allows a court to tell another person to stop doing something via an injunction, among other things.

What is the main purpose of equity? ›

Equity is important because it represents the value of an investor's stake in a company, represented by the proportion of its shares. Owning stock in a company gives shareholders the potential for capital gains and dividends.

What do we mean by equity? ›

The term “equity” refers to fairness and justice and is distinguished from equality: Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances.

What is the difference between equity and common law? ›

Common law typically refers to laws based on precedence and the rulings of judges who hear a case in a courtroom. Equity, on the other hand, refers to laws that are similarly established by court rulings but deal with judgment and justice through equitable decisions.

What is an equity case in law? ›

A court of equity is a type of court with the power to grant remedies other than monetary damages. These remedies include injunctions, writs, or specific performance among others.

What is the difference between law courts and equity courts? ›

ii) Courts of Law and Courts of Equity.

Courts of law administer justice according to criminal law and common law. Courts of equity administer justice according to criminal law and common law. Courts of equity administer justice according to "fairness". Some States had two different court systems.

What is an action in equity? ›

Action in Equity is a proceeding in court of equity that seeks equitable relief, such as an injunction or specific performance, as opposed to damages. Action in equity is also called, 'action at equity'

Videos

1. Antisemitism becoming 'worse and different' on college campuses: Civil Rights Lawyer
(Fox News)
2. A guidance counselor's Brief But Spectacular take on advocating for equity in schools
(PBS NewsHour)
3. Starting a Successful Healthcare Practice: Tips For Success
(Roetzel HealthLaw HotSpot)
4. A world where fish are no longer forced to climb trees.
(Mathemate Videos)
5. When Law Students Tell Me They Want A Career In Litigation
(Law Chambers of Amish Aggarwala)
6. The best "Elevator Pitch" of the World?
(Eric Prouzet)

Top Articles

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Otha Schamberger

Last Updated: 12/01/2022

Views: 5901

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (55 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Otha Schamberger

Birthday: 1999-08-15

Address: Suite 490 606 Hammes Ferry, Carterhaven, IL 62290

Phone: +8557035444877

Job: Forward IT Agent

Hobby: Fishing, Flying, Jewelry making, Digital arts, Sand art, Parkour, tabletop games

Introduction: My name is Otha Schamberger, I am a vast, good, healthy, cheerful, energetic, gorgeous, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.